Another relevant entry from xkcd:
Referring, of course, to Porn for Women, it’s a POV those of us into denial should remember from time to time.
Another relevant entry from xkcd:
Referring, of course, to Porn for Women, it’s a POV those of us into denial should remember from time to time.
Denying Thumper 
Hilarious, thank you!
I joined a dominant women’s writing group once, and they decided to write a collaborative erotic story, each taking turns contributing. After umpteen contributions revolving around 18th century ladies and well dressed gentleman ‘ooh err missus’ing at each other and exchanging meaningful looks, butlers and servants doing butlery and servanty things under disapproving eyes, it got to my turn and within two sentences there was nudity, hard cocks, wetness and wild eyed out of control flailing with evil instruments.
They never asked me to contribute again.
Ferns
LOL @ Ferns
The *ahem* dominant view is that women prefer the suggestion of the thing, rather than the thing itself. This is why pr0n that is targeted to women has story lines, more “romatic” settings (FSV “romantic”), etc.
But this strip also plays off the all-too-prevailing notion that the way to “make” your woman more dominant is to offer to do more household chores. That is one of the major selling points of chastity devices; your husband can earn orgasms by washing more dishes or vacuuming.
This misses the point that women who trade sex for labor (or money) are usually described with other words.
Great comment Ferns, and very interesting timing… since they had a bit on 30 Rock about “Porn for Women” this week too.